Why is it OK for shamanic practitioners and other healers and teachers to charge money?

A shamanic teacher reported to me recently that there was some feedback from someone angry that she was charging money for teaching something spiritual. I have seen the idea that spiritual things should be free - whether that's healing or classes.

I'd like to examine why that thinking is incorrect and where it might be coming from.

It's impractical to expect anyone to provide a service without some exchange

In a moment I'll talk about the supposed moral argument that spiritual healers and teachers shouldn't get paid, but let's focus on the purely practical aspects.

We live in a modern world. I have a family, a mortgage, and I just had to replace the furnace in my home. I find spiritual work extremely rewarding, but I also have to eat and feed my kids.

I have spent thousands of hours over many years learning my craft. I have to pay for travel, classes, supplies. Most practitioners have to pay for their healing space.

Our hearts are in the right place, but we simply couldn't do the work for people without a valuable exchange. In the times before money, there would be a collective caretaking of the spiritual leaders in the community. Housing and food would be provided communally in many cultures.

We don't live in that world. It's just not practical.

Further, spiritual work is work. It's OK to do it for free, but when there is an exchange of energy it can actually be more powerful. Money is a symbol of work - expended energy. You may find a teacher or practitioner willing to teach for other exchanges, on a sliding scale, etc.

I used to train martial arts at a Buddhist temple. I paid for those classes. There were live-in students, however, and their exchange was labor. They cooked, and cleaned, and gardened, and ran errands, Sitting in meditation all day, doesn't sweep the floor or cook the rice.

To paraphrase Madonna, we are spirits living in a physical world. We have to attend to body, mind, and spirit.

Money is unnecessarily seen as evil

You may have heard the quote from the bible, "money is the root of all evil." But this is probably the most often misquoted line from the Bible. The actual quote is, "For the love of money is the root of all evil."

This passage is talking specifically about greed, and how greed leads people off their spiritual path. It is not condemning money.

There is an argument to be made that money itself is a powerful tool of the patriarchy. The Romans discovered that it was easier to march their armies around with coins to buy wheels of cheese and loaves of bread than to cart huge amounts of food. around.

One belief I hold is that power itself is not good or evil, it's in the application. I can use a hammer to build a house or to club my neighbor. Money is a form of power. I can use it to feed myself and support charity, or I can use it to buy something harmful.

And yes, I recognize that the attachment to money has led many spiritual leaders down the wrong path.

We have weird views about money and spirituality

I recently watched the Netflix documentary, Wild Wild Country. This is about the spiritual leader Osho and his commune in the 1980s in Oregon.

His followers did some horrible things, like trying to poison political rivals. There's no argumnt there. But I was struck by how the narrative from the US government, the media, and the people around them focused on two things - sex and money.

Compared to sex and money, we have no worse psychological complexes as human society.

A big deal was made that Osho had a fleet of Rolls Royces and had bought up thousands of acres of land for his commune. This even became the topic of jokes on late-night TV with Johnny Carson.

But not one person who thought this was outrageous would complain that the Roman Catholic Pope sits on a gold throne in his own city and flies on private jets with an armed security force and drives around in a fleet of armored cars. We don't complain about the wealth in the megachurches or gold covered statues in some Hindu and Buddhist temples.

Historically there have always been religious sects which require vows of individual poverty from members. Some of these organizations have wielded extraordinary wealth. The Knights Templar, for example, were rich enough to loan money to countries.

I would argue that it's only our conception, our beliefs about money, that make it bad. There is nothing inherently bad or evil.

Shamans are all about the abundance

Shamans throughout the ages looked after the bodies, minds, and spirits of their community. This meant reading signs and accessing spirit to determine when to plant crops. Shamans would help ensure successful hunts. 

Many ancient spiritual artifacts recovered by archaeologists depict figures associated with fertility.

What are fertility and a successful hunt if not material abundance? In days before money, it was all about the food.

In Japan, one might have a Shinto priest do a blessing for a successful business, and provide a charm to ensure prosperity. Likewise, Taoism is full of charms, rituals, and prescriptions for money.

In the US, we have the primarily African American syncretic practices of Hoodoo or Conjure. These practices have mane cures, spells, charms, even scents for attracting money.

In this respect, Shamanic practitioners who help clients are not different in not considering money evil. We all think differently. but I honestly think we should be helping our clients with issues from health to finances.

In my view, everything in this world has a spiritual component. Money is no different, it has a spiritual template and a mental and physical presence. 

Shamanic healing may actually help with issues of financial prosperity. The toolbag of shamanism includes psychological wound-healing, clearing ancestral issues, and addressing the shadow. All of these are places where money blocks might occur.

So, for spiritual practitioners. money really isn't an issue, unless it's an issue. There's nothing inherently un-spiritual about an exchange or using money for that exchange. It is only rigid thinking that makes it so.

Is shamanism cultural appropriation?

Sometimes a question of cultural appropriation arises in talking about shamanism.

Cultural appropriation is an idea that comes from sociology and is when a dominant culture takes items from a minority culture and incorporates them. This is seen as a negative when items from the minority culture are reduced in meaning - like when they are made into toys or mascots

I do not believe that the vast majority of people practicing shamanism today are, in any way, participating in cultural appropriation.

Let's start with the word shaman. In English, "shaman" was borrowed from the German, which was borrowed from the Russian, which was borrowed from the Tungus people of Siberia. But the word has origins beyond the Tungus as well. We don't know if it was borrowed originally from Chinese or Pali. It may have come from Sanskrit before that, and who knows beyond that?

It has come to mean, in the West, a set of spiritual practices that have been practiced by nearly every culture on the planet at some point.

Core Shamanism bridges cultures

Most People practicing a form shamanism that hasn't been inherited from their own indigenous culture, practice something referred to as Core Shamanism. Core Shamanism is a set of spiritual practices, assembled by people doing anthropological and ethnographic research.

What these researchers found is that cultures around the world did a number of the exact practices. For example - shamans in every culture use sound - such as percussive rhythm - to drive trance. Shamans travel to spiritual worlds and form relationships with spiritual allies.

Cave art, thousands of years old, depicts shamanic states and practices. No one culture in existence today is the source of Core Shamanism.

Shamanism is everyone's birthright

The practices we know as shamanic appear to have been practiced in some form in every culture. From ancient Egypt to the Norse, to African, Celtic, Native American, and Asian cultures. No matter what your Ancestry.com DNA test tells you-you came from a shamanic culture. Perhaps you came from numerous shamanic cultures.

The spiritual technologies of shamanism are inherent in your makeup.

Some cultural practices and tools are universal

Think of the bow and arrow and the drum. They exist in different forms across almost all cultures. From the most isolated tribes of the Amazon to the Greeks and Romans to the Japanese - almost everybody has these same tools.

Trance is a tool of mind/body/spirit practiced across cultures as well. It can take different forms - from Buddhist meditation to Ayahuasca journeys in Peru. But altering the state of mind for spiritual practice is universal.

It's easy, in the US, to see people gathered in a drum circle, beating hide drums, and think that they are stealing a Native American ceremony. This is an image you may have been exposed to and linked with Native American culture. But, again, drumming and drum circles cross many cultures.

Shamanism is done with a sense of honor towards the sacred

The main argument about cultural appropriation centers on reducing the value of cultural items. Shamanism, as I have witnessed it, holds every practice sacred. 

I have practiced a Japanese martial art for decades. When we train, we wear kimono and obi. We bow in a traditional way, Japanese terms of respect are used, instructions are sometimes given. Before and after practice we bow to the kamiza - seat of the spirits. All of these practices are done with honor for the culture they come from.

Many years ago, I had the pleasure of training with and observing a number of masters who traveled from the Budokon in Japan for an exhibition. One very senior teacher was very excited to see that I held a practice sword correctly. Some of the archers gave arrows they had shot as gifts to visitors. These teachers were so happy to share a bit of their culture with those who respect it.

I think, when it's done with knowledge, permission, guidance, and honor, there are sacred practices that can be adopted. There are indigenous teachers out there who are happy to share their practices. And, I think, this makes the world better. 

Likewise, I will always honor taboos about sharing certain things with outsiders.

I will end with the first principle of Huna, as elucidated by Serge Kahili King:
A'ohe pau ka 'ike i ka halau ho'okahi ,
"All knowledge is not taught in one school,"